EmberKat

Services

Technology decisions, architecture reviews and remediation delivery.

Architecture, vendor and platform decisions; systems blocking delivery; technical risk in transactions; and findings that need implementation.

Discuss the work
A software architecture map built from layered tracing film, dependency lines, integration boundaries and decision markers.
Service map

The work connects technology decisions, architecture, security evidence and remediation without forcing every problem into the same service.

Scope of work

What the work covers

An engagement can use one service or combine several where architecture, security, cost and delivery are linked.

Defined engagements

Duration, deliverables and starting price

Starting prices exclude VAT. Final scope, exclusions and commercial terms are confirmed in a written proposal. Engagements are delivered remotely, and geography is not a constraint on scope — on-site work is arranged only where the work requires it, and is quoted separately.

Exclusions

What I do not sell

Managed IT, a SOC, or 24/7 incident response

Round-the-clock cover needs a staffed rota, which is a different business from advisory work. A response time nobody is rostered to meet is not a response time.

Certification guarantees, or compliance by scan

The auditor decides, and nobody else can commit on their behalf. A scan reports what a tool can see — not who owns the control or whether it works, which is the part a reviewer asks about.

Developers by the head

Billing per person per month removes the reason to finish. Every engagement here is priced against an outcome instead, which is the opposite incentive.

Vendor-funded recommendations

A commission would settle the recommendation before the assessment started. There is no reseller margin anywhere in this, which is also why cheap advice is not on offer.

Contact

Send the decision, system or findings context

You get back the relevant service, the inputs it needs and a proposed scope.

Send the context